<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Aeroinstructor &#187; Business Operations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aeroinstructor.com/category/flight-instruction/business-operations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aeroinstructor.com</link>
	<description>resources for flight instructors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 17:39:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Team Instruction Part 1 (going with the flow)</title>
		<link>http://www.aeroinstructor.com/2006/03/team-instruction-part-1-going-with-the-flow/</link>
		<comments>http://www.aeroinstructor.com/2006/03/team-instruction-part-1-going-with-the-flow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 20:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Operations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flight Instruction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consistancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[team]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Virtually every place I have worked for over the years has engaged in team instruction. It could be a formal phase check with a different instructor. If could be a way of keeping the student on track when their primary CFI was out sick, on a charter, or otherwise unavailable. In other cases, it can [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Virtually every place I have worked for over the years has engaged in team instruction. It could be a formal phase check with a different instructor. If could be a way of keeping the student on track when their primary CFI was out sick, on a charter, or otherwise unavailable. In other cases, it can be used to get a student through a learning plateau. Its a great way to foster a well rounded student through diversity of instructional techniques. </p>
<p>Communication and consistancy are key. As CFI&#8217;s we all have different ways of doing things, and in some cases, we may even consider one CFI&#8217;s approach to be totally wrong&#8230; However, we have to take a big picture view of this, and that is consistency for the students sake, even if it goes against our personal opinions and bias.</p>
<p>For example, I have always taken a dim view of 30 minute preflights. Other instructors seem to be pleased with such an approach. Now, if I&#8217;m working at a school that advocates a 30 minute preflight, then thats what I will teach to my primary students. If I&#8217;m working at a school that has a no lean policy below 5000 feet, then I will teach leaning as an academic exercise only. I will however take up these somewhat unusual practices with the chief instructor, or the owner in private. Their may be reasons why they wish to do these things. Such reasons may only be old wives tails, or they may be valid given other extenuating factors. Either way, they are the one paying the tab, and professionalism suggests I follow their lead even if I disagree. Of course this does not preclude going along with blatantly unsafe operating practices, nor breaking the law in order to please the boss.</p>
<p>The reason for this is not to be a wimp, but to provide a consistant and unified instructional environment for the student. Once they have their certificate or rating, at that time, if the owner of the flight school agrees, we can go into different ways of approaching flying. I think it is critical for every CFI candidate to be exposed to a wide variety of instructional and procedural techniques. </p>
<p><span id="more-29"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.aeroinstructor.com/2006/03/team-instruction-part-1-going-with-the-flow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Aircraft Utilization &#8211; running a flight school</title>
		<link>http://www.aeroinstructor.com/2006/03/aircraft-utilization-running-a-flight-school/</link>
		<comments>http://www.aeroinstructor.com/2006/03/aircraft-utilization-running-a-flight-school/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 17:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Operations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flight school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If I compare aircraft utilization today, to the early 80&#8217;s, it is sad, really sad. I think too many flight schools have their rates cranked way up. They are failing to reach a decent level of aircraft utilization, and in order to remain viable, are passing the fixed costs on to their students with high [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I compare aircraft utilization today, to the early 80&#8217;s, it is sad, really sad. I think too many flight schools have their rates cranked way up. They are failing to reach a decent level of aircraft utilization, and in order to remain viable, are passing the fixed costs on to their students with high hourly rates.</p>
<p>An aircraft on the ground is like leaving your wallet open to the wind. Sure, some of the time, it can&#8217;t be helped due to weather or maintenance issues. Otoh, with proper marketing, management, and weather most aircraft should be flying 100 hours/month at a minimum, and 200 is golden. So now, that folks think I&#8217;m crazy, or that this can only occur at an air college program, lets get on with how to make it work.</p>
<p>First of all, maintenance: 100 hour inspections and all maintenance can be scheduled at night, thus minimizing flight interruptions. We used to start 100 hour inspections in the late afternoon/early evening Unless we ran into parts problems, most of the time we were done by 2AM. Since we did 100 hour inspections every 2-3 weeks, we would document items that were getting worn, such that they could be replaced at the next 100 hour, or in the next 200 hours depending on the wear rate. This kept us from having to stock lots of tires, brake parts, and other consumable maintenance items.</p>
<p>Secondly, pre-scheduling. Unlike today, we would have our students schedule the airplane for more than just the next lesson. This alone, kept the schedule pretty full.</p>
<p>Thirdly, night flight: There is no reason not to teach instrument flying at night, and to include significant night dual during the later hours of private pilot training. It keeps the aircraft available for VFR students, and intro flights during the daylight hours. In addition, for most students, proficiency at night operations really solidifies their day operations. Of course this is a matter of instructor judgement&#8230; but I will tell you that doing 720 degree turns at night as a 15 hour student pilot, sure made it a lot easier to do them during the daytime hours.</p>
<p>Fourth, sell, sell, and sell some more: One days when the weather was bad, it was time to get on the horn and make 10-20 calls. We&#8217;d call potential students, current students, and students who had completed training. These were not scripted activities, but  more a check in sort of like &#8220;this is Ron from Valley Aviation, hows it going, how was your last flight, how are the kids etc, followed up by some banter, and then asking if they would like to schedule some recurrent training, or try out a new aircraft, or if nothing else, sn invite to stop on out, have some coffee, and fly the hanger.</p>
<p>Fifth hanger flying: Our hanger had people there from 7AM-7PM most of the time&#8230; . The coffee, and the atomic bomb shelter candy, and donuts were always available. (Although the coffee generally was not too good after 2PM!). It was always interesting to come back and find out some of our students were doing the selling for us&#8230; The local police, and business owners of the community often times would stop in for a chat every few days. What this did was create an aviation community across a wide spectra of society. It might be the 15 year old kid one day, talking to a retired grey beard, or a big corp wheel taking with a farmer, but all had this one goal in mind, flying. I think too many FBO&#8217;s go the corp way today, and their is no oppurtunity for the hanger to be flown&#8230; and it does affect aircraft utilization, and the financial performance of the flight school.</p>
<p>Sadly, what i see today in aviation is a lack of proactive marketing such as occured 20 years ago. The flight school no longer has the high utilization rates, so it has to raise hourly rates to cover the fixed costs. This in turn keeps many of the 15 year olds away from the airport, and its a serious deterrant to the young man with a familiy.</p>
<p>However, should a flight school market aggresively, their is still a huge potnential to make money in the business. I just don&#8217;t understand why it doesn&#8217;t happen anymore. Has time building become such a focus that business no longer matters to CFI&#8217;s? Sure, a CFI doesn&#8217;t like making $8-$10/hour to make coffee, cold call, pump fuel, answer phones, wrench planes, clean the john, or do whatever, just to be on site. However, the same CFI is going to be the one with a full plate of students in short order, as he was there to sell. Ask yourself, who makes a better flight school salesman, a CFI, or the line guy who has 4 airplanes backed up, or the receptionist who is trying to hold the place together, or the manager/owner who has his own plate full&#8230; Its the CFI, the one who can do all the grunt work as needed, yet stop in an instant to talk with a potential client should one walk in the door. Its the CFI who is cleaning the floor that can pop in with a quick answer to the guys flying the hanger, that gets 3 new students for a proficiency training program. Its the CFI who was there, when a fellow CFI&#8217;s student had a bad day, and needed a confidence boost, rather than to give up.</p>
<p>Such actions are true professionalism, and are not demeaning in the least&#8230; unless of course, you don&#8217;t want to make money in the flight school business. Then it may be fine to be on call, show up just for a few students now and then, and provide no help whatsoever to all the other people that make a flight school successful. Its your choice, what shall you do?<br />
<span id="more-28"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.aeroinstructor.com/2006/03/aircraft-utilization-running-a-flight-school/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
